I've read many a profile where models have stated "no nudity" as they were following in the footsteps of the high end fashion industry and unless you're Playboy knocking, don't bother. And such is their right to have that preference level. However, it'll be fun to tweak some of them in the forums with this little factoid! 38 and still a wonder to behold!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/1 … es_in=6754
Well, first, I don't call that nude, but implied. lol.
But I think she looks fantastic.
But there is a lot of implied/nude in editorial modeling on the runways and in print these days, especially in the top body region. but it is done in a completely different aspect than you would say, playboy.
playboy is more of a glorified glamour modeling to promote the womans, um, assests, where as the editorial fashion industry is more about the garments and maybe the slight sex appeal they bring with that nip slip.
Of course selling clothes is selling clothes, selling sex is selling sex, Playboy is Playboy, implieds are implieds, fashion is fashion, and newbie models who state "I don't get nekkid unless you're Playboy" are newbie models being newbie models, who won't get nekkid unless you're Playboy.
It's just fun to tweak some folks on their foibles on occasion. The above was written as a farce, with an example to illuminate it as being as such.
Oh no I comepletely get where you are getting at and understand it and the logic.
I just find the green models, well, green, in their logic lol.