Your shot does have kind of a snapshot/realistic look to it which is going to make some people like it more and some like it less.  It probably doesn't help that one model looks happy and one upset so people can project anything they want into it.

To answer your question... I wouldn't say I *hate* it, but people really like this image  - I've sold a bunch of copies including probably 3-4 platinum prints, and while I like it OK I know what a salvage job it is.  It's 90% desaturated because she had a terrible tan line that I didn't know what else to do with it, and I didn't like the way it looked in pure black and white however I was converting at the time (looks great as a platinum print luckily).  And that dark area on the right was my attempt to blend in the line from the shutter curtain because somehow I'd bumped a setting and the sync was off.  And now that I'm looking at it, the crop on the bottom's screwy - looks like I cut through her knees.  And some people have commented negatively on the amputated arm thing.

I guess I could go back and fix a lot of that in post these days, but basically I've never liked it enough to bother and it sells and I don't know why so I'm kind of afraid to touch it!

I think we've all got images that we dislike and others like.  Proximal bias is a strong thing. We know all those little things that are "wrong" (or that we messed up) with them, while others don't know/see them, for whatever reason.  It's like the difference between a models "best of set" pick and a shooters "best of set" pick almost always being different.

To embed images in your posts on this (and almost all) boards, use BBCode:

[img]the%20url%20to%20the%20image%20without%20spaces[/img]

There's also a button just above the text entry field.  Click on that button and it automatically places the img tags, and you'll need to paste the url between the tags.

M. Carle wrote:

http://www.san-francisco-nudes.com/sample/img_1983.htm

I love this one of Doug's, and if anyone has bought any of Iona I would be shocked, somehow I keep feeling I did a shit job that day looking at the gallery, I keep feeling that my images should have been cut because they are not as strong as the rest of the galleries.

Helena's an amazing model - I use that light all the time but I think that's still my favorite with that lighting.

I sold a couple of Iona 8x10s just a few days ago, so there.

M. Carle wrote:

Doug even told me he wanted natural, not posed, that is what people buy...

I don't remember exactly what I said but I think with the outdoor stuff in particular it's easy to over do the posing.  And a lot of the stuff that sells is very simple, or at least looks very simple.  Like this image:  doesn't look super posed but there's a lot of subtle things she's doing right.  But it can be really hard to get a model to just let a hand relax and fall naturally - everybody always wants to put it someplace artificial.